<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Cubs May Do with Their Soon-To-Be Rule 5 Eligible Prospects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/05/20/what-the-cubs-may-do-with-their-soon-to-be-rule-5-eligible-prospects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/05/20/what-the-cubs-may-do-with-their-soon-to-be-rule-5-eligible-prospects/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris mccall</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/05/20/what-the-cubs-may-do-with-their-soon-to-be-rule-5-eligible-prospects/#comment-15438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris mccall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=1329#comment-15438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Stephen Bruno should be given a shot in the major leagues.  He could a lot to a team]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Stephen Bruno should be given a shot in the major leagues.  He could a lot to a team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jtwalsh</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/05/20/what-the-cubs-may-do-with-their-soon-to-be-rule-5-eligible-prospects/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jtwalsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2015 12:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=1329#comment-848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rule V eligibility was changed to add one more year of control (4 for players signed 19+ and 5 for players 18 and younger) several years ago. http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/2007/262720.html

Either the description above or the list is inaccurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule V eligibility was changed to add one more year of control (4 for players signed 19+ and 5 for players 18 and younger) several years ago. <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/2007/262720.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/2007/262720.html</a></p>
<p>Either the description above or the list is inaccurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/05/20/what-the-cubs-may-do-with-their-soon-to-be-rule-5-eligible-prospects/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 20:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=1329#comment-798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick clarification, players on the 60-day DL have to be reinstated to the 40-man or released prior to the Rule 5 draft, so you cannot stash guys there to make room for R5D guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick clarification, players on the 60-day DL have to be reinstated to the 40-man or released prior to the Rule 5 draft, so you cannot stash guys there to make room for R5D guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/05/20/what-the-cubs-may-do-with-their-soon-to-be-rule-5-eligible-prospects/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 18:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=1329#comment-782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought you may have been exaggerating on the &quot;crunch&quot; but I actually went through the lists and made check marks. Between players definitely staying on the 40 man, and players that would definitely be added to the 40 man. I come in at 30. When you factor in several bullpen members a centerfielder and a starting pitcher are likely to be added, it does approach 40 rather quickly. I would anticipate a couple of the moves you suggested. It makes sense to move a guy like Shawn Dunston Jr, Bruno, or Candelario. I&#039;d love to get back a compensatory pick or pile them together for a major league piece as opposed to saving some international money, but that&#039;s the fan in me. If saving that money now allows them to strike in free agency with a full piggy bank, then let&#039;s do it. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s as simple as that, but it&#039;ll be interesting to see if anything happens on that front.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you may have been exaggerating on the &#8220;crunch&#8221; but I actually went through the lists and made check marks. Between players definitely staying on the 40 man, and players that would definitely be added to the 40 man. I come in at 30. When you factor in several bullpen members a centerfielder and a starting pitcher are likely to be added, it does approach 40 rather quickly. I would anticipate a couple of the moves you suggested. It makes sense to move a guy like Shawn Dunston Jr, Bruno, or Candelario. I&#8217;d love to get back a compensatory pick or pile them together for a major league piece as opposed to saving some international money, but that&#8217;s the fan in me. If saving that money now allows them to strike in free agency with a full piggy bank, then let&#8217;s do it. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as simple as that, but it&#8217;ll be interesting to see if anything happens on that front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
