<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wearing &#8216;Em Down: Cubs&#8217; Hitters Are Really Good at Running Up the Count</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/06/29/wearing-em-down-cubs-hitters-are-really-good-at-running-up-the-count/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/06/29/wearing-em-down-cubs-hitters-are-really-good-at-running-up-the-count/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian Watt</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/06/29/wearing-em-down-cubs-hitters-are-really-good-at-running-up-the-count/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rian Watt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=2243#comment-1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, great to hear from you! It&#039;s an interesting point, although I should say at the outset that I was referring to overall pitch counts, rather than Cubs&#039; hitters working deep counts (though there are of course interaction effects). Here&#039;s a couple of ways to get at your question:

1. Look at the Cubs offense independently of the pitching. The Cubs have a top-7 NL offense by tAV (.263) and a top-5 MLB offense by offensive VORP (156.1) so, generically, I think it&#039;s unlikely that they don&#039;t have the offense to push pitchers out of games;

2. Look at the runs allowed per pitch by opposing starters against the Cubs, vs. against the rest of the league;

3. Look at the innings starters pitch against the Cubs, versus the rest of the league;

4. Look at how many pitches per plate appearance the Cubs are seeing;

5. Possibly others, but I&#039;m quite tired at the moment.

I&#039;ll put in some data requests and look into it. I generally think point #1 strongly suggests it isn&#039;t inneffective offense, but I&#039;m happy to be proven wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great to hear from you! It&#8217;s an interesting point, although I should say at the outset that I was referring to overall pitch counts, rather than Cubs&#8217; hitters working deep counts (though there are of course interaction effects). Here&#8217;s a couple of ways to get at your question:</p>
<p>1. Look at the Cubs offense independently of the pitching. The Cubs have a top-7 NL offense by tAV (.263) and a top-5 MLB offense by offensive VORP (156.1) so, generically, I think it&#8217;s unlikely that they don&#8217;t have the offense to push pitchers out of games;</p>
<p>2. Look at the runs allowed per pitch by opposing starters against the Cubs, vs. against the rest of the league;</p>
<p>3. Look at the innings starters pitch against the Cubs, versus the rest of the league;</p>
<p>4. Look at how many pitches per plate appearance the Cubs are seeing;</p>
<p>5. Possibly others, but I&#8217;m quite tired at the moment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll put in some data requests and look into it. I generally think point #1 strongly suggests it isn&#8217;t inneffective offense, but I&#8217;m happy to be proven wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cy</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/06/29/wearing-em-down-cubs-hitters-are-really-good-at-running-up-the-count/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=2243#comment-1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting numbers, but aren&#039;t you leaving out an important variable in terms of how long those starters lasted in those games?  I.e. A high pitch count by a starter against the Cubs might be due to them running up counts, but could also be the product of the offense being ineffective and therefore able to last 8 or 9 innings of effective pitching.  If you look at the highest game scores (e.g. The 20-strikeout Kerry wood game), they all have super-high pitch counts. Not sure that having a high average starter&#039;s pitch count means that you&#039;re actually getting to the bullpen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting numbers, but aren&#8217;t you leaving out an important variable in terms of how long those starters lasted in those games?  I.e. A high pitch count by a starter against the Cubs might be due to them running up counts, but could also be the product of the offense being ineffective and therefore able to last 8 or 9 innings of effective pitching.  If you look at the highest game scores (e.g. The 20-strikeout Kerry wood game), they all have super-high pitch counts. Not sure that having a high average starter&#8217;s pitch count means that you&#8217;re actually getting to the bullpen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
