<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Cubs Are Writing Their Way Into the History Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kelley</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 18:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a diehard Red Sox and I just love this Cubs team. Looks like you guys made the right move in hiring Theo. I&#039;d love to see a Red Sox vs. Cubs World Series, wouldn&#039;t that be historic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a diehard Red Sox and I just love this Cubs team. Looks like you guys made the right move in hiring Theo. I&#8217;d love to see a Red Sox vs. Cubs World Series, wouldn&#8217;t that be historic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jimenez</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Jimenez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2008, fixed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008, fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cephy</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cephy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 18:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what world did the 2007 Cubs (85-77) have the best record in baseball? They had the worst record of any NL playoff team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what world did the 2007 Cubs (85-77) have the best record in baseball? They had the worst record of any NL playoff team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jimenez</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Jimenez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 18:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do think it is harder to have the best record over the course of an entire year than to win 2 series to make the World Series.  

I think the reasoning for such parity in the last decade and a half is that teams are smarter. Improved scouting, teams know their own strengths, have better roster creation for the playoffs, and can exploit other team&#039;s weaknesses.  I think if you look at the 2008 Cubs for instance, the team had the best record in the NL but was swept by the Dodgers mainly due to the Dodgers never throwing a lefty at a righty heavy Cubs lineup. 

This 2016 Cubs team doesn&#039;t really have any weaknesses right now, unless they have more injuries occur, and the historically great teams I looked at, were also juggernauts in that regard. 

The teams in recent history that broke the 105-win threshold all made it to the World Series except that Seattle team who lost to the Yankees at the end of their dynasty run so maybe 105 is the point where teams aren&#039;t just good but exceptional where the rules of parity no longer exist? That was a point I was trying to get across.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think it is harder to have the best record over the course of an entire year than to win 2 series to make the World Series.  </p>
<p>I think the reasoning for such parity in the last decade and a half is that teams are smarter. Improved scouting, teams know their own strengths, have better roster creation for the playoffs, and can exploit other team&#8217;s weaknesses.  I think if you look at the 2008 Cubs for instance, the team had the best record in the NL but was swept by the Dodgers mainly due to the Dodgers never throwing a lefty at a righty heavy Cubs lineup. </p>
<p>This 2016 Cubs team doesn&#8217;t really have any weaknesses right now, unless they have more injuries occur, and the historically great teams I looked at, were also juggernauts in that regard. </p>
<p>The teams in recent history that broke the 105-win threshold all made it to the World Series except that Seattle team who lost to the Yankees at the end of their dynasty run so maybe 105 is the point where teams aren&#8217;t just good but exceptional where the rules of parity no longer exist? That was a point I was trying to get across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor19nyc</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[victor19nyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 18:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goal number one: win the division. The Cubs are making a statement that they&#039;re not going to settle for the one-game wild card again.

Despite the sweep against the Nationals, play either them or the Mets in a one-game wild card at your peril.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goal number one: win the division. The Cubs are making a statement that they&#8217;re not going to settle for the one-game wild card again.</p>
<p>Despite the sweep against the Nationals, play either them or the Mets in a one-game wild card at your peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heidi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael 

Love the article, but you are saying having the best record in baseball over the course of the year, is more difficult than getting though 2 play off series. 
If that is true, why has only one team with the best record won the WS since 2000.

Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael </p>
<p>Love the article, but you are saying having the best record in baseball over the course of the year, is more difficult than getting though 2 play off series.<br />
If that is true, why has only one team with the best record won the WS since 2000.</p>
<p>Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jimenez</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Jimenez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 15:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This did not slip my mind and I gave it a lot of thought. I do agree when you are looking only at winning percentage; however, they still had to win that many games, and for the majority of those teams, they still won the World Series. 

The argument works both ways as well. You can argue for those teams pre-playoff expansion were guaranteed to get in; however, you&#039;re basically saying it was easier to make the World Series back then than it is now. I would highly disagree with that sentiment because you had to have the best record in your league, period. There was no second chance and even if you were a historically great team, there could have been another team better than you (1931 for example).

One of the reasons I also used three different lenses to investigate,  was because neither of the hot start teams or highest run differential teams were guaranteed to be the best team in their division record-wise, so their auto-inclusion into the World Series was not guaranteed pre-playoff expansion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This did not slip my mind and I gave it a lot of thought. I do agree when you are looking only at winning percentage; however, they still had to win that many games, and for the majority of those teams, they still won the World Series. </p>
<p>The argument works both ways as well. You can argue for those teams pre-playoff expansion were guaranteed to get in; however, you&#8217;re basically saying it was easier to make the World Series back then than it is now. I would highly disagree with that sentiment because you had to have the best record in your league, period. There was no second chance and even if you were a historically great team, there could have been another team better than you (1931 for example).</p>
<p>One of the reasons I also used three different lenses to investigate,  was because neither of the hot start teams or highest run differential teams were guaranteed to be the best team in their division record-wise, so their auto-inclusion into the World Series was not guaranteed pre-playoff expansion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 15:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, the vast majority of those teams reached the World Series in years where all you had to do to get into the World Series was have the best record in your league (something dominant teams such as the ones you listed are automatically going to do since you&#039;re selecting for extraordinary regular season dominance).

It&#039;s largely irrelevant with the playoff system we have today.  Only a few of those teams had to participate in even so many two rounds of playoffs (1969 and onward).  Totally changes the equation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the vast majority of those teams reached the World Series in years where all you had to do to get into the World Series was have the best record in your league (something dominant teams such as the ones you listed are automatically going to do since you&#8217;re selecting for extraordinary regular season dominance).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s largely irrelevant with the playoff system we have today.  Only a few of those teams had to participate in even so many two rounds of playoffs (1969 and onward).  Totally changes the equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolitiJim (@politiJim)</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/09/pardon-the-interruption-but-these-cubs-are-rewriting-history/#comment-10418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PolitiJim (@politiJim)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=10795#comment-10418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and all this without...
-Schwarber
- Heyward&#039;s historical OBP
- Miggy
- Soler&#039;s late 2015 season form]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and all this without&#8230;<br />
-Schwarber<br />
&#8211; Heyward&#8217;s historical OBP<br />
&#8211; Miggy<br />
&#8211; Soler&#8217;s late 2015 season form</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
