<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Depth, Flexibility, and Time: Why the Cubs&#8217; Offseason Makes Sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/29/why-the-cubs-offseason-makes-sense-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/29/why-the-cubs-offseason-makes-sense-so-far/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SK</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/29/why-the-cubs-offseason-makes-sense-so-far/#comment-15746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 20:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=16666#comment-15746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True, but the WS win gave the long-term strategy breathing room it almost certainly would not have enjoyed if the Cubs had dropped game seven. Winning the whole thing meant the FO could stay the course, as you put it; losing it and you might have seen them stretch more to get back right away. Far more likely Fowler would have been retained in that scenario, same with Hammel, Wood, and maybe even Chapman (or Jansen might have been more heavily pursued). 

As a big believer in the long-term strategy, it makes me even more glad (if such a thing were possible) that the Cubs won the WS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but the WS win gave the long-term strategy breathing room it almost certainly would not have enjoyed if the Cubs had dropped game seven. Winning the whole thing meant the FO could stay the course, as you put it; losing it and you might have seen them stretch more to get back right away. Far more likely Fowler would have been retained in that scenario, same with Hammel, Wood, and maybe even Chapman (or Jansen might have been more heavily pursued). </p>
<p>As a big believer in the long-term strategy, it makes me even more glad (if such a thing were possible) that the Cubs won the WS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CHI Sports Fan (@TheCHISportsFan)</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/29/why-the-cubs-offseason-makes-sense-so-far/#comment-15742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The CHI Sports Fan (@TheCHISportsFan)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=16666#comment-15742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would add that TheoJed made it clear LAST offseason they knew this FA market was thin and they approached Ricketts to buy into the FA market to cover both years.   These guys stick to a budget.

Also - if I recall correctly they clearly stated Monty would be rotational arm prospect for them when they acquired him.

I don&#039;t see them reacting to this year&#039;s market or last year&#039;s success.  I see them staying the course on a strategic plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would add that TheoJed made it clear LAST offseason they knew this FA market was thin and they approached Ricketts to buy into the FA market to cover both years.   These guys stick to a budget.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; if I recall correctly they clearly stated Monty would be rotational arm prospect for them when they acquired him.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see them reacting to this year&#8217;s market or last year&#8217;s success.  I see them staying the course on a strategic plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
