<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a Cubs &#8220;D-Peat&#8221; Imperative?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/27/is-a-cubs-d-peat-imperative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/27/is-a-cubs-d-peat-imperative/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CHI Sports Fan (@TheCHISportsFan)</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/27/is-a-cubs-d-peat-imperative/#comment-16393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The CHI Sports Fan (@TheCHISportsFan)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 23:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=17209#comment-16393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really question that Boston Globe stat.  First - the training, preventive care and sports science from 5 years ago, much less 30 years ago is remarkably different.  Grouping pitcher performance seems ridiculous.

Similarly, they TYPES of pitchers are different. Gunslingers like Chapman who rely (almost solely) on athleticism put totally different stresses on the body than a Hendricks or Maddux.  I would bet that even starting pitchers fall into different subsets of their REAL &quot;peak&quot; performance age.

In the past 5 years - only Kershaw was actually under the age of 26.  I wish I had the time to go and find the mean age of Cy Young winners in the past 5, 10, years and each of the decades previously.  A 42 year old Clemens might beg to differ that he peaked at 26.

AGE when winning the CY
Scherzer - 32, 29
Porcello - 28
Arrieta - 29
Keuchel - 28
Kershaw - 23, 25, 26
Kluber - 28
Dikey - 38
Price - 27
Verlander - 28]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really question that Boston Globe stat.  First &#8211; the training, preventive care and sports science from 5 years ago, much less 30 years ago is remarkably different.  Grouping pitcher performance seems ridiculous.</p>
<p>Similarly, they TYPES of pitchers are different. Gunslingers like Chapman who rely (almost solely) on athleticism put totally different stresses on the body than a Hendricks or Maddux.  I would bet that even starting pitchers fall into different subsets of their REAL &#8220;peak&#8221; performance age.</p>
<p>In the past 5 years &#8211; only Kershaw was actually under the age of 26.  I wish I had the time to go and find the mean age of Cy Young winners in the past 5, 10, years and each of the decades previously.  A 42 year old Clemens might beg to differ that he peaked at 26.</p>
<p>AGE when winning the CY<br />
Scherzer &#8211; 32, 29<br />
Porcello &#8211; 28<br />
Arrieta &#8211; 29<br />
Keuchel &#8211; 28<br />
Kershaw &#8211; 23, 25, 26<br />
Kluber &#8211; 28<br />
Dikey &#8211; 38<br />
Price &#8211; 27<br />
Verlander &#8211; 28</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Scott</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/27/is-a-cubs-d-peat-imperative/#comment-16387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=17209#comment-16387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a really interesting question, for sure. In 2015, the defense wasn&#039;t statistically elite, so I think luck and just the durability of the rotation is a bigger factor. But I&#039;m sure it helps ease the stress knowing you can get away with more thanks to a stellar defense behind you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a really interesting question, for sure. In 2015, the defense wasn&#8217;t statistically elite, so I think luck and just the durability of the rotation is a bigger factor. But I&#8217;m sure it helps ease the stress knowing you can get away with more thanks to a stellar defense behind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Thomson</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/27/is-a-cubs-d-peat-imperative/#comment-16372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Thomson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=17209#comment-16372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also wonder if the Cubs&#039; sterling defense is having a positive effect on pitchers&#039; physical health.  Assuming that making &quot;high stress&quot; pitches is correlated with injury (on which I have no relevant data), a great defense will limit the overall stress level.  Also, a great defense will also lower pitch counts, thus removing the high pitch counts associated with pitching injuries.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a coincidence that the Cub pitching staff has been remarkably injury-free over the past two years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wonder if the Cubs&#8217; sterling defense is having a positive effect on pitchers&#8217; physical health.  Assuming that making &#8220;high stress&#8221; pitches is correlated with injury (on which I have no relevant data), a great defense will limit the overall stress level.  Also, a great defense will also lower pitch counts, thus removing the high pitch counts associated with pitching injuries.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a coincidence that the Cub pitching staff has been remarkably injury-free over the past two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
