<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carl Edwards, Jr. &amp; the Role of Future Cubs Closer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/04/carl-edwards-jr-the-role-of-future-cubs-closer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/04/carl-edwards-jr-the-role-of-future-cubs-closer/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCHISportsFan</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/04/carl-edwards-jr-the-role-of-future-cubs-closer/#comment-17218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCHISportsFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=17919#comment-17218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantastic.  Thanks for the addition...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic.  Thanks for the addition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theguz7</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/03/04/carl-edwards-jr-the-role-of-future-cubs-closer/#comment-17216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theguz7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=17919#comment-17216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Randy.

If you take a look at his OPS, you will see an even clearer picture of his dominance and the weak contact he surrenders--when they make any at all. Wade Davis leads all MLB over the past 3 yrs with a .456 OPS.

Edwards&#039; OPS in &#039;16:  .456.

Not sure why baseball-ref requires an additional click to get to OPS (as opposed to less indicative numbers like ERA and WHIP), nor why minors OPS is so difficult to find for P&#039;s, but Edwards had a season as low as .300+ down there.  Mentioning a P&#039;s WHIP while leaving out his OPS is the equivalent of leaning on a hitter&#039;s OBP and ignoring his OPS when assessing his overall value.  Dunno why that is still so prevalent, but it&#039;s one thing I&#039;d like to see changed in the stat revolution.

IMO, OPS is at least as indicative as FIP and maybe DRA, and is far easier to calculate.  In Edwards&#039; case, it is a clear picture of dominance.

Here&#039;s another:  heading into last yr, Edwards had pitched 292 IP in the minors, and gave up 3 HR.  That just may be the best mark in MLB history--by a mile.  I&#039;ve only comp&#039;d him to every Cub P and about 60 of the greatest Ps of All Time, and no one comes close.  That he did it as a starter makes it even more impressive.  The kid may give up some walks, but he&#039;s damn near unhittable.

Thx again for a nice piece on a great P.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Randy.</p>
<p>If you take a look at his OPS, you will see an even clearer picture of his dominance and the weak contact he surrenders&#8211;when they make any at all. Wade Davis leads all MLB over the past 3 yrs with a .456 OPS.</p>
<p>Edwards&#8217; OPS in &#8217;16:  .456.</p>
<p>Not sure why baseball-ref requires an additional click to get to OPS (as opposed to less indicative numbers like ERA and WHIP), nor why minors OPS is so difficult to find for P&#8217;s, but Edwards had a season as low as .300+ down there.  Mentioning a P&#8217;s WHIP while leaving out his OPS is the equivalent of leaning on a hitter&#8217;s OBP and ignoring his OPS when assessing his overall value.  Dunno why that is still so prevalent, but it&#8217;s one thing I&#8217;d like to see changed in the stat revolution.</p>
<p>IMO, OPS is at least as indicative as FIP and maybe DRA, and is far easier to calculate.  In Edwards&#8217; case, it is a clear picture of dominance.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another:  heading into last yr, Edwards had pitched 292 IP in the minors, and gave up 3 HR.  That just may be the best mark in MLB history&#8211;by a mile.  I&#8217;ve only comp&#8217;d him to every Cub P and about 60 of the greatest Ps of All Time, and no one comes close.  That he did it as a starter makes it even more impressive.  The kid may give up some walks, but he&#8217;s damn near unhittable.</p>
<p>Thx again for a nice piece on a great P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
