<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cubs Bolster Rotation, Land Quintana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/13/cubs-bolster-rotation-land-quintana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/13/cubs-bolster-rotation-land-quintana/</link>
	<description>Just another Baseball Prospectus Local Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renegade</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/13/cubs-bolster-rotation-land-quintana/#comment-19721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renegade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=20626#comment-19721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note to Jarrett Seidler (the BP guy quoted above):

The salary cap is an actual thing.  The Yankees are trying to get under it, the Dodgers are trying to get down close to it.  The Red Sox are counting pennies and waiting to make a deal because they only have around $7 million of &quot;cap space&quot; remaining (per Cafardo) or *they go into the luxury tax

Don&#039;t think of this trade on face value, the return was better because of Q&#039;s contract.  The Cubs may have an extra $10-15 million to work with the next three seasons because of the contract.  (Versus paying market rate for a playoff-worthy starting pitcher in the offseason.)

Would the deal sound better to you if it was Jimenez and Cease + for 3½ years of Quintana AND three more seasons of Wade Davis?

Not saying that&#039;s what Epstein will do with the extra cash, but the deal gives the Cubs room to make an extra move - every roster decision needs to consider salary cap considerations.

We&#039;ll see when Harper and Machado hit the market in November 2018, but it seems to me that the clubs are treating this luxury tax very seriously.  The penalties are no longer &quot;just money&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Jarrett Seidler (the BP guy quoted above):</p>
<p>The salary cap is an actual thing.  The Yankees are trying to get under it, the Dodgers are trying to get down close to it.  The Red Sox are counting pennies and waiting to make a deal because they only have around $7 million of &#8220;cap space&#8221; remaining (per Cafardo) or *they go into the luxury tax</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think of this trade on face value, the return was better because of Q&#8217;s contract.  The Cubs may have an extra $10-15 million to work with the next three seasons because of the contract.  (Versus paying market rate for a playoff-worthy starting pitcher in the offseason.)</p>
<p>Would the deal sound better to you if it was Jimenez and Cease + for 3½ years of Quintana AND three more seasons of Wade Davis?</p>
<p>Not saying that&#8217;s what Epstein will do with the extra cash, but the deal gives the Cubs room to make an extra move &#8211; every roster decision needs to consider salary cap considerations.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see when Harper and Machado hit the market in November 2018, but it seems to me that the clubs are treating this luxury tax very seriously.  The penalties are no longer &#8220;just money&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/13/cubs-bolster-rotation-land-quintana/#comment-19719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=20626#comment-19719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree that the main value of Quintana is cheap control -- he is a quality, young, controlled pitcher. The cheapness is just a bonus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that the main value of Quintana is cheap control &#8212; he is a quality, young, controlled pitcher. The cheapness is just a bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCHISportsFan</title>
		<link>http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/13/cubs-bolster-rotation-land-quintana/#comment-19717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCHISportsFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrigleyville.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=20626#comment-19717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent write up.  TheoJed keeps surprising me.  I felt for sure they would actually use the misfortune to replenish the farm asset bank, but I also think it&#039;s a mistake to assume this means they are all in on competing this year.  If Cubs really do terribly in the next 2 weeks, I wouldn&#039;t put it past them to sell Wade and Jake to try and recoup assets to go after next season.  After all - they needed JQ for next year whether they were competing or not this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent write up.  TheoJed keeps surprising me.  I felt for sure they would actually use the misfortune to replenish the farm asset bank, but I also think it&#8217;s a mistake to assume this means they are all in on competing this year.  If Cubs really do terribly in the next 2 weeks, I wouldn&#8217;t put it past them to sell Wade and Jake to try and recoup assets to go after next season.  After all &#8211; they needed JQ for next year whether they were competing or not this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
